There are certain places in the Hebrew Scriptures where it
sort of feels like you’re brushing up against something that none of us has
ever seen, and yet it’s deeply familiar, almost archetypal nonetheless: a
glimpse of the world not as it is,
but as it could, or should, or might someday be. Isaiah 2:4 is such a place, with its oracle
about the nations streaming to the mountain of the Lord, learning his ways and
beating their swords into plowshares; Isaiah 11:6 is another such place, with
its description of the lion laying down with the fattened calf and the little child
leading them; so too is Psalm 46 and its vision of a river “whose streams make
glad the city of God.”
The Winter is Over: A Reading of Song of Solomon
The Hebrew word for this “glimpse of the world not as it
is but as it should be” is shalom. The word shalom
simply means “peace,” but when it’s used in this particular, lion-lie-down-with-the-lamb
sense of the term, it means more than just the laying down of arms or the end
of conflict. Shalom is a deeply-rooted, broadly-spreading vision of perfect Peace,
where everything in the Creation is in its right place in relation to the
Creator, and everything is in life-giving harmony with everything else, because it’s in the place, and
functioning in the way, that the Creator intended.
Theologian Conrelius Plantigna describes it in this
way: “In the Bible, shalom means universal flourishing, wholeness
and delight – a rich state of affairs in which natural needs are satisfied and
natural gifts fruitfully employed, a state of affairs that inspires joyful
wonder as its Creator and Savior opens doors and welcomes in the creatures in
whom he delights. Shalom, in other words, is the way things ought to be.”
Besides stirring the imagination generally, this
theologically rich concept of Shalom
also provides us a helpful way into one of the more difficult books of the
Bible, that collection of vivid Hebrew love poems known as the Song of Solomon,
with its entwined lovers whispering sensual odes to one another’s beauty and
grace and charm.
Because if we’re listening for them, we won’t get very
far into this song of songs before we start to hear echoes of shalom—pictures, that is to say, of the
creation flourishing with wholeness and delight. This is actually part of the artistry of the
Song: the sensual joy which the lovers find in one another’s arms is matched by
descriptions of the creation itself, joyfully and sensually flowering all
around them. The winter is past and blossoms
burst open across the earth (2:11-12); the air is trembling with dove-song and
dripping with flower-fragrance (2:13). And
this will carry on to the end: the vines have blossomed early (8:12) and the
mandrakes lace the air with their heady perfume (8:13).
There are even
deeper layers to this, of course; because as they describe each other with
enraptured similes and impassioned metaphors, the lovers begin to embody in
themselves the flourishing of the creation that is happening all around them. The Lover is, by turns, a fragrant cluster of
henna blossoms (1:14), a fruit-laden apple-tree (2:3), a graceful stag on the
high places (2:17), the dawn, the moon, and sun in stately procession
(6:10). The Beloved, for her part, is a
dove in the cleft of the rocks (2:14), a spring of clear water (4:12), a
verdant garden bursting with the choicest fruit and the rarest spice (4:13-14). If we can resist the modern temptation to
titter at such imagery (or to Freudianize it) we’ll hear the Song of Songs
saying this: listen! shalom is
obtaining, here, in the joyful, wholesome, unabashed union of this man and this
woman, as they come together according to the Creator’s design.
The Shalom theology
pulsing at the heart of this ancient love song is actually implicit in the
names of the lovers themselves. The
Lover, on the one hand, is an idealized portrait of King Solomon, the most-wise
king from whom the Song of Solomon takes its name (1:1, 3:7). In Hebrew literature, of course, names are
never accidental, and this is especially the case here: the name Solomon (in
Hebrew shelômôh)
is a derivative of the word shalom itself.
Solomon is quite literally the King of Shalom.
The Beloved, on the other hand, is simply called “the Shulamite” (6:13);
but this is especially curious to me, because the name “Shulamite” (in Hebrew, shûlammı̂yth) is a feminine derivation of “Solomon.” The Shulamite is “Solomon’s girl,” that is to
say, Princess Shalom. In other words,
what we are seeing in the rapturous union of these two lovers is the marriage
of Mr. and Ms. Shalom. Little wonder, then, that as they consummate
their love we see creation bursting with shalom-ordered
vibrancy all around them: their coming together not only fits into the puzzle-picture of God’s Shalom,
but, like a final missing piece, it actually completes it.
And here is where the ancient text begins to speak into
the modern world. Because the point of
Song of Songs is that sexuality, when it is experienced and enjoyed according
the Creator’s design, actually promotes and contributes to shalom in the world. There
is an “ought to/ought not to” when it comes to sex, and its underlying goal is
the flourishing of the Creation itself.
This is hard to wrap our heads around practically, how
the Creator’s intention for sex is to promote creation shalom; but it gets easier when we come at it from the other
direction, and consider how quickly sex can vandalize shalom, when it happens outside
of the Creator’s intention. The strong
sexually exploiting the weak is not shalom.
The trauma of sexual abuse is not shalom. The loss and betray of a marital affair, the
tears that a sexual scandal rips in the social fabric, the relational pain and
confusion caused by pornography, the psychological scars that the 'hook-up' culture leaves on the heart—none of these things are shalom.
I don’t mention any of these things flippantly, or
naively, or judgmentally; and reading Song of Songs as a Christian I want to say
that in Jesus—our true Prince of Peace—there is real healing and restoration
and redemption available for even the deepest
sexual wounds we may have suffered. But
that, I think, is part of the point.
Because in Christ, the Song of Songs is inviting us to consider how our
sexuality—even our sexuality—can, and could, and does fit into the Creator’s
plan to make a world where things are the way they ought to be.
Labels: marriage, OT, sexuality, song of songs
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 comments:
Post a Comment