Happy 2011 everyone. I trust you rang in the New Year with verve and gusto. Me: a rollicking game of Settlers of Catan followed by our family's New Years tradition: watching home movies. Nothing like welcoming a new year by laughing and reflecting together on the last 12 as a family.
And speaking of traditions: this time last year I posted a random list of stats and figures on my first year blogging. Not long after that post, I discovered Google Analytics, a free service provided by Google that tracks a wide variety of stats on your web-site's usage. With the help of Google Analytics I've compiled this list of statistical curiosities from another year blogging at terra incognita. For those of you who contributed to any of the following numbers, thanks for joining me for another trip around the blog-o-sphere sun. For what they're worth, here're some random weights and measures of 2010 .
1. Top five cities from which visitors arrived: Oshawa, Ontario (327); Toronto, Ontario (204) Grand Rapids, Michigan (194),Caronport, Saskatchewan (177); London, Ontario (125)
2. Most distant visitor: Someone from Chennai, India, (13,646 km away)
3. Most common landing keyword (i.e. what people typed into Google to find their way to me): “prayer for the offering”
4. Top five most commonly visited posts: A Prayer for the Offering (916); On Kafka Dreams (113); Tidings of Great Joy (96); Pangs of Northerness(92); The Geometry of Heaven? (66);
5. Overall average time spent on site: 49 seconds
6. Most common (non-search engine) referring site: This Side of Sunday (314)
7. Total hits in 2010: 6,646
8. Most Commented-on Post: Blogging in the Echo Chamber (5)
9. Worst Post: Upon hearing that Austin Texas is renaming 2nd Street (this one sounded funnier in my head than it did on the screen; at least it was short).
10. Most Fun Post to Write: The Adventures of Elroy (or what has Nintendo to do with Jerusalem?)
A Blogging Year in Review
Labels: lists, new year, retrospective
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
2 comments:
I find it hard to believe that I visited your site less than 125 times.
I know. I thought the numbers seemed a bit wrong, too... but who am i to argue with the all-knowing google. 125 on not, I appreciate the visits either way.
Post a Comment